Pitfalls #2 – Multi-Machine & Acoustics

Multi-Machine Installations & Acoustics: Beware of Cumulative Effects

“But each machine is rated at 85 dB(A)…”

This is a common comment when the overall noise level of an installation exceeds expectations.

Individually, each fan complies with its specification — typically measured at 1 meter in free-field conditions.
Collectively, however, the installation may become too noisy.

Why?

Because in acoustics, sound levels do not add up linearly.
They combine logarithmically — and that makes a significant difference.

The classic pitfall: comparing isolated values

In multi-machine projects, the reasoning often goes like this:

  • Fan A: 85 dB(A) at 1 m
  • Fan B: 85 dB(A) at 1 m
  • Fan C: 85 dB(A) at 1 m

The intuitive conclusion: we remain close to 85 dB(A).

In reality:

Two identical 85 dB(A) sources result in about 88 dB(A)

Three sources approach 90 dB(A)

Each additional source increases the overall sound level.

And even this remains a simplified view…

Distance and environment make a major difference

Published noise values are generally measured:

  • At 1 meter
  • In free-field conditions
  • Without obstacles

In real installations:

  • Machines are positioned close to each other
  • Walls reflect sound
  • Ductwork transmits noise
  • Steel structures can radiate vibration

The surrounding environment can locally amplify sound levels far beyond theoretical values.

👉 In industrial acoustics, thinking per machine and relying solely on catalog values is a mistake.

Key takeaway

In multi-machine configurations:

  • Sound levels combine logarithmically
  • Distance strongly affects perceived sound pressure
  • The environment can significantly amplify the effect

Most acoustic overruns are not caused by a “noisy fan,”
but by the absence of a system-level analysis during the design phase.